Fawcett (2010: 289-90):
As an illustration of the way in which the different layers of a tree structure are related to each other in the framework of the present theory, consider Figure 25. …
This is not the place for a full explanation as to why the analysis in Figure 25 is as it is. (For this level of detail, see Fawcett in press.) But it may be helpful, in the task of understanding precisely how the present theory differs from the Sydney Grammar, if I comment on a couple of points.
Blogger Comments:
[1] On the contrary, this is precisely the place for a full explanation as to why the analysis in Figure 25 is as it is because this publication is an exposition of the theory that underlies it.
[2] To be clear, Fawcett (in press) is still unpublished 21 years after the first edition of this publication, and so also is the detailed argument in support of the analysis.
No comments:
Post a Comment